Re: [nvrg-bof] poll on charter focus - RESPONSES DUE OCT 23

[Chris Lonvick <clonvick at cisco.com>]

Hi,

I would also like to cast my opinion for "a" as a starting point.  I think 
that the systems (hosts, services, storage, etc.) will need to be aware of 
how the network is virtualized so they can participate, but let's start by 
coming to grips with the network aspect.

Best regards,
Chris

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, Joe Touch wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Aaron Falk wrote:
> >     To be very explicit, I'd like to ask whether the folks on this list
> >     who might participate in a research group feel that such an RG
> >     should focus on a) the virtualization of networks or b)
> >     virtualization of systems including networks and others things such
> >     as hosts, services, storage, sensors/actuators.
>
> Hi, all,
>
> Work on updating the charter proposal hasn't progressed since the last
> meeting in Stockholm. Aaron and I exchanged some ideas a month ago, and
> Aaron asked for people to voice their position above then. I haven't
> heard any discussion.
>
> In order for this group to move forward, we need to decide what our
> focus is. So, to that end, I'll summarize the current views:
>
> 	a) virtualization of networks
> 		Joe
>
> 	b) virtualization of systems,
> 	incl. networks, hosts, services, storage, sensors/actuators
> 		Aaron
>
> Can everyone on this list please try to post a short not indicating your
> view of where this group should focus ASAP, no later than Friday Oct 23.
> That should help us gauge how to proceed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe (just as a list member)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkrSOWQACgkQE5f5cImnZrseOwCfS2TZMlR3goricP61J9O8TLl0
> btgAoOn6+MJdOkdPRUKLrpHF9OD3tMlw
> =LOZb
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----