-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 James Kempf wrote: ... > Anyway, so absent a commitment for that kind of co-operation, I'd say > that IETF meetings don't need another RG for people to come and present > work that they could do at an academic conference or another industry > forum. I'm confused about this - that metric would kill nearly every current RG, wouldn't it? Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkrUkPkACgkQE5f5cImnZrurzwCeIoTini/M8VSThlsjlFBpaXSf cDwAnAxMDr0ghpiOy6q//KqCBZEELxDf =H4lr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.