[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [nvrg-bof] Updated charter proposal



Thanks Joe for providing the authoritative info on XBone.. We are trying to update the ComMag article with the XBone info before it goes to the press.. But I will certainly update the preprint(s) on my website. 

Btw, I would say that the ComMag one is basically an extended abstract of the survey with the primary objective of gaining more attention to the network virtualization movement.

Any how, as I mentioned before, we (http://netlab.cs.uwaterloo.ca/virtual) were and still are looking forward to comments/inputs from everyone, and we would like to take part in / lead! efforts regarding standardizing/structuring/creating an altogether new RFC/charter or updating the existing techreport with necessary changes (if minimal) through mutual discussions in the community.

Mosharaf

--
Mosharaf K Chowdhury
http://www.mosharaf.com



On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

PS - two updates to that note below:

1) a more recent version is appearing in IEEE Communications in July 2009

2) both versions still have a few bugs

a) PlanetLab is not an overlay (there are no virtual links, interfaces,
or addresses) (it should not appear in Table 1 either)

b) Table 1 incorrectly lists X-Bone as application-layer, whereas it is
network layer.

c) the appropriate reference for the X-Bone should have been:
Dynamic Internet Overlay Deployment and Management Using the X-Bone. Joe
Touch. Computer Networks, July 2001, pp. 117-135

Joe


Joe Touch wrote:
>
> Joe Touch wrote:
> ...
>>> Also, I'd propose to (4) have some state of the art document that
>>> overviews current solutions to a wide range of techniques for
>>> virtualizing network resources.
>> There was a paper I saw a draft of fairly recently that did a good job
>> of this. I'll see if I can get the authors involved in the WG or see if
>> they want to offer their info as input to a draft.
>
> OK, so it only took me a few hours to figure out that this doc was
> actually posted on this list back in October (yikes!).
>
> See attached. I wonder if we actually need an RFC if there's already a
> sufficient tech report in this space? If we do, then I would nominate
> Mosharaf to lead the effort (if of interest) ;-)
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: [nvrg-bof] Further steps
> From:
> "Mosharaf Chowdhury" <mosharafkabir at gmail.com>
> Date:
> Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:28:56 -0400
> To:
> "Martin Stiemerling" <Stiemerling at nw.neclab.eu>
>
> To:
> "Martin Stiemerling" <Stiemerling at nw.neclab.eu>
> CC:
> nvrg at listserv.gwdg.de
>
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> I believe you would be interested in the survey we have put together
> recently. You can find the technical report here:
> http://www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/research/tr/2008/CS-2008-25.pdf. Any comment,
> critique will be very much appreciated.
>
> And I'd be glad to contribute in the compilation of a formal problem
> statement for NVRG.
>
> Btw, I was wondering whether there is anything formally named IRTF NVRG
> (administratively speaking) ?
>
> -Mosharaf
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Martin Stiemerling
> <Stiemerling at nw.neclab.eu> wrote:
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     Some words on what are the next steps IMO:
>
>     - I'm about to compile a problem statement for Network
>     Virtualization Research Group. This draft should be a write-up
>     containing some clarification of terminology and a sketch of the
>     problem space the NVRG would tackle.
>     - Planning a new meeting at the upcoming IETF meeting in
>     Minneapolis, if people are interested to join. Some information
>     about the upcoming IETF meeting: http://www.ietf.org/meetings/73/
>
>     Let me know if you're interest in contributing.
>
>      Martin
>
>     stiemerling at nw.neclab.eu
>
>     NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division
>     NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road,
>     London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mosharaf K Chowdhury
> Cheriton School of Computer Science
> University of Waterloo
> http://www.mosharaf.com/
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkowFFAACgkQE5f5cImnZruwyACg5D06oyTVDXLQz4vtIAEOqg7A
N7EAoPSdrWbUDnNgn1m61lw4hz/nNllF
=CePZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.