-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Katsushi Kobayashi wrote: > Hi, > > I think the charter draft is fine. A minor comment is the followings: > > l.4. > ........... These resource can be network components, such as, for > example, routers, switches or hosts, and also services, such as, for > example, > name mapping systems. ..... > > In the above, there is no "circuit" and "link" technology in the network > component type enumeration. I think it should be add, if it can be consists > of virtualized network. Agreed, with enthusiasm. I'd say "virtual link", rather than "circuit" - since circuit has other implications (must be 1:1, must have fixed resources, etc.) Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkov1EYACgkQE5f5cImnZrutZACeNIaMYgshZF5u/rK48WPHDEMy YBgAnjKcC1lGSUcn0Vd87uBqYnCMkGc0 =PmuG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.