-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Catching up... PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri wrote: ... > Two base comments: > > o) "research challenges" should include a specific work item on a > "problem statement/observations" vs "needs" e.g. why are the intended > functionality not resolvable with the current Internet/where are the > limitations ?/etc. Such effort would be allow to identify more clearly > the architectural and design goals (if the approach is inductive > documenting set of representative use cases can be considered). Agreed. > o) the "Identifying architectural challenges resulting from virtual > networks" is the only research topic, the others are either statements > (i) or sub-components of one possible design (ii) or bottom-level > implementation issues (by the way which issues are foreseen beside > interop ?). Henceforth, I suggest to detail the list of research points. IMO, that doesn't need to happen in the charter. Charters should be vague and give the WG wiggle room to do the most effective work possible without requiring inordinate overhead (e.g., to recharter). Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkov0R8ACgkQE5f5cImnZruezgCgxcRsvHvETow78T21ERVlbY/r M7kAnAhe2Ris2h8uSxcoW8cwLlKv0j9j =ODqn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.