[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [nvrg-bof] What is Network Virtualization?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin (et al.),

Martin Stiemerling wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| It has been quite silent on the NVRG list for a while. Sorry for that.
|
| I have been stepping back a bit and considered what network
virtualization actually might be.
|
| So is there the first attempt to get some discussions started.
|
| Apparently there are different camps in the area of network
virtualization (at least from my recent experience):
| a) network virtualization in test beds (GENI, parts of 4WARD, Akari, etc)
	while interesting, this seems an application of (b) below,
	and decidedly uninteresting architecturally; testbeds have no
	unique requirements in this area, IMO
	I'd include rbridges/trill and L2VPNs here.

| b) network virtualization for the Internet (parts of 4WARD, my own
idea, etc)
	including X-Bone, FWIW ;-)

| c) existing parts, for instance, l*vpn in the IETF and virtual router
support in existing devices.
	this includes LISP and NERD, but I would not include L2VPNs
	or L3VPNs here.

(a) arguably includes virtualization at any layer
(c) arguably are components of (b)

IMO, the IRTF/IETF ought to focus on (b) and the components of (c) that
support (b).

| For each of the above, different meanings of what network
| virtualization is, might apply. The least common dominator between all
| of them is, that they want to reuse an existing resouce (e.g., host,
| router, link, switch, virtual network) for multiple "usages". For a) the
| usage is running multiple experiements on the same infrastructure while
| b) envisions running multiple Internet-technologies on the same global
| infrastructure. c) is, at least to my understanding, not aiming at a
| complete set of infrastructure, but targeting specific virtualization
| needs (e.g., VLAN on ethernet).

Usage is irrelevant and ephemeral. (perhaps irrelevant because it's
ephemeral, if you prefer...

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIV/ATE5f5cImnZrsRAt9rAJ9jPEgbCbP4j/UZRQKxpI0tukgFNgCfTFcT
5HSaUF4xtDrN6ziJDZWFltc=
=NY6A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.