Re: [vnrg] FW: Fwd: I-DAction:draft-jeong-vnrg-virtual-networks-ps-00.txt

["Sangjin Jeong" <sjjeong at etri.re.kr>]

Hello Vishwas,
 
Thanks for your comments and editorial suggestion. 
I generally agree with you. 
Please see inline.
 
> Hi, 
> 
> I had a brief look at the document. I had a few comments on the same: 
> 
> 1. Introduction - We have talked about advantages of virtualization. 
> One of the big benefits of virtualization are the economy of scale. As 
> the CPU/ Memory is costs are decreasing, so using a system with higher 
> CPU and Memory is better then using 10 systems with 1/10 the memory. 
> 
> 1.1 Another advantage WRT physical infrastructure, I can see is that 
> we can partition resources into chunks that was not possible earlier. 
> So we can have links which are like 1.7 Mbps, which allows a higher 
> level of compartmentalization. 
> 
> 2. Introduction - From the way you are talking about network 
> virtualization, there is an overhead of resources required for the 
> physical topology connectivity, over which the virtual topology 
> resides. 
> 
> 2.2 A disadvantage I can see is that physical topology change will 
> cause effect to the virtual links, though the effects may not be 
> visible to the virtual topology itself.
 
One of the ways to support virtualization is to adopt additional layer 
such as virtualization layer in resources. But, this approach can cause 
performance degradation due to the additional layer, as you pointed out. 
Also, the virtual networks will be affected by the change of physical 
network infrastructure, so how to provide dynamic reconfiguration of 
virtual networks without interruption of the operation is an important 
challenge.
 
> 
> 3. A lot of routers have virtual router functionality, which allows 
> for sharing of resources, between various different instances, in a 
> non-interfering fashion, over the same OS instance though. We cannot 
> impose any virtual topology on the physical topology, but can be a 
> subset of the same. Another example of the same is Multitopology 
> extensions. You can talk about these things in the Motivation section 
> you mention. 
> 
> 4. I think one important aspect of isolation is to allow for 
> paritioning of resources so that one misbehaving resource does not 
> affect the other.
 
Agree. Misbehavior of resource or virtual network such as security problem, 
overconsumption of physical resource, etc. should not be spread over other 
resources or networks. 
 
> 
> 5. From the management perspective, we need different layers of 
> management. One which partitions the physical resource to a virtual 
> resource, then each virtual resource needs an isolated manager.
 
Managers (or management functions) for creating and managing the virtual 
networks are one of key components for supporting virtual networks. This 
management function can be included in virtualization layer or separate 
layer.
 
> 
> 6. I think one of the important security issue is physical security 
> will no longer work. By adding a new layer virtualization increases 
> overload, as well as a new vector for security.
 
Right. Introducing additional layer or management function can cause 
new security problems, for example, compromised management function may 
affect all the virtual resources over the physical resource. 
 
Also, I will incorporate editorial suggestions into the next version of 
the document.
 
Regards, 
Sangjin
 
> 
> Typo: 
> 
> 1. Abstract -  This document presents the definition and effectiveness 
> of virtual networks and discusses the key components and challenges of 
> supporting virtual networks on "physical network infrastructure". 
> 
> Added the words in "...". 
> 
> 2. 
>    s/ The virtual networks over physical infrastructure are completely 
> isolated each other, /  The virtual networks over physical 
> infrastructure are completely isolated from each other, / 
> 
> 3. s/ Virtualization resource is typically realized by adopting 
> virtualization layer in the physical resources,/ Virtualization of a 
> resource is typically realized by adopting virtualization layer in the 
> physical resources,/ 
> 
> 4. s/efficient control of the virtual resources../ efficient control 
> of the virtual resources./ 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Vishwas 
> 
> ============================================= 
> Dear VNRG folks, 
> 
> As a follow-up of last Beijing meeting, we have developed a document that 
> investigates the definition, key components and challenges, and acid tests 
> for 
> virtual networks. 
> 
> Please find the document from link below. 
> Any comments are appreciated. 
> 
> Regards, 
> Sangjin 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- 
> From: <Internet-Drafts at ietf.org> 
> Date: Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 5:00 PM 
> Subject: I-D Action:draft-jeong-vnrg-virtual-networks-ps-00.txt 
> To: i-d-announce at ietf.org 
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories. 
> 
> Title : Virtual Networks Problem Statement 
> Author(s) : S. Jeong, D. Colle 
> Filename : draft-jeong-vnrg-virtual-networks-ps-00.txt 
> Pages : 9 
> Date : 2010-12-23 
> 
> This document presents the definition and effectiveness of virtual 
> networks and discusses the key components and challenges of 
> supporting virtual networks in the networks. ?It also describes acid 
> tests for virtual networks. 
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jeong-vnrg-virtual-networks-ps-00.tx 
> t 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: 
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/