[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vnrg] Logical vs. virtual

From: "$witch" <a.spinella at rfc1925.net>
To: vnrg at irtf.org
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 17:58:00 +0100
In-reply-to: <E84E7B8FF3F2314DA16E48EC89AB49F0818112 at DAPHNIS.office.hd>
References: <4C3F0DC4.2060705 at intec.UGent.be> <4C3F26BF.7090009 at isi.edu><4C3F390A.2090403 at intec.UGent.be> <4C3F3C87.1010303 at isi.edu> <E84E7B8FF3F2314DA16E48EC89AB49F0818112 at DAPHNIS.office.hd>
List-id: "Virtual Networks Research Group $VNRG$ discussion list" <vnrg.irtf.org>

On 02/08/11 16:37, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
......


Virtual on the other hand describes more the fact that you can use something which is actually not really existing, ...


Hi, Martin and all

as newbye am adding just "canonicals 2 cents" :

in my mind virtual has "temporary-limited" meaning more than"not-really-existing" while logical implies something that will bemultiplexed by a phisical "something" (as in logical-interfaces andphisical-interfaces); maybe definition can include (or exclude) thatinterpretation.





Alessandro

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [vnrg] Logical vs. virtual
  - From: Martin Stiemerling

References:
- [vnrg] Logical vs. virtual
  - From: Didier Colle
- Re: [vnrg] Logical vs. virtual
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: [vnrg] Logical vs. virtual
  - From: Didier Colle
- Re: [vnrg] Logical vs. virtual
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: [vnrg] Logical vs. virtual
  - From: Martin Stiemerling

Prev by Date: Re: [vnrg] Logical vs. virtual
Next by Date: Re: [vnrg] Logical vs. virtual
Previous by thread: Re: [vnrg] Logical vs. virtual
Next by thread: Re: [vnrg] Logical vs. virtual
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.