Re: [nvrg-bof] poll on charter focus - RESPONSES DUE OCT 23

[Sangjin Jeong <sjjeong at gmail.com>]

Hi all,

I think proposal a) is better suited for the scope of the RG.

Regards,
Sangjin

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Aaron Falk wrote:
>>     To be very explicit, I'd like to ask whether the folks on this list
>>     who might participate in a research group feel that such an RG
>>     should focus on a) the virtualization of networks or b)
>>     virtualization of systems including networks and others things such
>>     as hosts, services, storage, sensors/actuators.
>
> Hi, all,
>
> Work on updating the charter proposal hasn't progressed since the last
> meeting in Stockholm. Aaron and I exchanged some ideas a month ago, and
> Aaron asked for people to voice their position above then. I haven't
> heard any discussion.
>
> In order for this group to move forward, we need to decide what our
> focus is. So, to that end, I'll summarize the current views:
>
>        a) virtualization of networks
>                Joe
>
>        b) virtualization of systems,
>        incl. networks, hosts, services, storage, sensors/actuators
>                Aaron
>
> Can everyone on this list please try to post a short not indicating your
> view of where this group should focus ASAP, no later than Friday Oct 23.
> That should help us gauge how to proceed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe (just as a list member)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkrSOWQACgkQE5f5cImnZrseOwCfS2TZMlR3goricP61J9O8TLl0
> btgAoOn6+MJdOkdPRUKLrpHF9OD3tMlw
> =LOZb
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>