[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [nvrg-bof] nvrg Digest, Vol 16, Issue 6



I support option b) in the charter. a) might be a practical first step.

C.

>
> Aaron Falk wrote:
> >     To be very explicit, I'd like to ask whether the folks on this
list
> >     who might participate in a research group feel that such an RG
> >     should focus on a) the virtualization of networks or b)
> >     virtualization of systems including networks and others things
such
> >     as hosts, services, storage, sensors/actuators.
>
> Hi, all,
>
> Work on updating the charter proposal hasn't progressed since the last
> meeting in Stockholm. Aaron and I exchanged some ideas a month ago,
and
> Aaron asked for people to voice their position above then. I haven't
> heard any discussion.
>
> In order for this group to move forward, we need to decide what our
> focus is. So, to that end, I'll summarize the current views:
>
>        a) virtualization of networks
>                Joe
>
>        b) virtualization of systems,
>        incl. networks, hosts, services, storage, sensors/actuators
>                Aaron
>
> Can everyone on this list please try to post a short not indicating
your
> view of where this group should focus ASAP, no later than Friday Oct
23.
> That should help us gauge how to proceed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe (just as a list member)



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.