Dear Joe, all,
our team is interested in virtual networks,
but not in virtualization of systems.
We are currently involved in a project called
Manticore (some of you probably know it):
http://www.i2cat.net/en/projecte/manticore-1
From this project, we can see some aspects that
in our opinion need an standardization:
- There is a problem when different vendor devices
should be in the same virtual network: API or protocol
definition required, in a similar way that SMTP does, but
now considering the middleware.
- There is a problem in the interoperatibility between
virtual networks: Routing, addressing, QoS parameters, etc.
We are very interested in participate actively, but we
don't see clearly how. We belong to this distribution list
since summer 2008, and we are progressing too slowly. How
can we (all) boost the target and the work plan ?
Hope it can be useful.
Best regards,
Xavier and Felipe,
===========================================
Dr. Xavier Hesselbach-Serra
Associate Professor
Dept. Enginyeria Telemàtica
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
C/Jordi Girona, 1 i 3
Mòdul C3 - Campus Nord
08034 Barcelona
Tel: + 34 93 401 59 87
Fax: + 34 93 401 10 58
e-mail: xavier.hesselbach at entel.upc.edu
===========================================
The information contained in this electronic mail message is
confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
authorised to receive it. If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, copying, dissemination or disclosure of
this information is strictly prohibited. If you receive
this e-mail message in error please notify me
immediately by e-mail at xavier.hesselbach at entel.upc.edu.
Thank you.
Joe Touch escribió:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aaron Falk wrote:To be very explicit, I'd like to ask whether the folks on this list who might participate in a research group feel that such an RG should focus on a) the virtualization of networks or b) virtualization of systems including networks and others things such as hosts, services, storage, sensors/actuators.Hi, all, Work on updating the charter proposal hasn't progressed since the last meeting in Stockholm. Aaron and I exchanged some ideas a month ago, and Aaron asked for people to voice their position above then. I haven't heard any discussion. In order for this group to move forward, we need to decide what our focus is. So, to that end, I'll summarize the current views: a) virtualization of networks Joe b) virtualization of systems, incl. networks, hosts, services, storage, sensors/actuators Aaron Can everyone on this list please try to post a short not indicating your view of where this group should focus ASAP, no later than Friday Oct 23. That should help us gauge how to proceed. Thanks, Joe (just as a list member) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkrSOWQACgkQE5f5cImnZrseOwCfS2TZMlR3goricP61J9O8TLl0 btgAoOn6+MJdOkdPRUKLrpHF9OD3tMlw =LOZb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.