Hi All,
I support both topics as subjects of Research Group, but do feel that we should use Virtualiztion of Networks as a starting point and then grow into areas of services, sensors, storage etc. It should be possible to have either two groups working concurrently but synched with each other OR have a group start off with Virtualization of Networks and then at a future point in time diverge in different directions of specialities. Or, some combination of the two of the above :-)
Just my two cents. :-)
Many thanks for this amazing effort!
Best Regards
santanu
Santanu Ganguly
United Kingdom
Mobile: 0783 717 0448
________________________________
From: nvrg-bounces at listserv.gwdg.de [mailto:nvrg-bounces at listserv.gwdg.de] On Behalf Of Dae Young KIM
Sent: den 21 oktober 2009 16:48
To: Joe Touch
Cc: nvrg at listserv.gwdg.de
Subject: Re: [nvrg-bof] poll on charter focus - RESPONSES DUE OCT 23
Hi,
I support pursue of both topics in the RG.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu<mailto:touch at isi.edu>> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Falk wrote:
> To be very explicit, I'd like to ask whether the folks on this list
> who might participate in a research group feel that such an RG
> should focus on a) the virtualization of networks or b)
> virtualization of systems including networks and others things such
> as hosts, services, storage, sensors/actuators.
Hi, all,
Work on updating the charter proposal hasn't progressed since the last
meeting in Stockholm. Aaron and I exchanged some ideas a month ago, and
Aaron asked for people to voice their position above then. I haven't
heard any discussion.
In order for this group to move forward, we need to decide what our
focus is. So, to that end, I'll summarize the current views:
a) virtualization of networks
Joe
b) virtualization of systems,
incl. networks, hosts, services, storage, sensors/actuators
Aaron
Can everyone on this list please try to post a short not indicating your
view of where this group should focus ASAP, no later than Friday Oct 23.
That should help us gauge how to proceed.
Thanks,
Joe (just as a list member)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrSOWQACgkQE5f5cImnZrseOwCfS2TZMlR3goricP61J9O8TLl0
btgAoOn6+MJdOkdPRUKLrpHF9OD3tMlw
=LOZb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Regards,
DY
http://cnu.kr/~dykim
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.