Hi All, I support both topics as subjects of Research Group, but do feel that we should use Virtualiztion of Networks as a starting point and then grow into areas of services, sensors, storage etc. It should be possible to have either two groups working concurrently but synched with each other OR have a group start off with Virtualization of Networks and then at a future point in time diverge in different directions of specialities. Or, some combination of the two of the above :-) Just my two cents. :-) Many thanks for this amazing effort! Best Regards santanu Santanu Ganguly United Kingdom Mobile: 0783 717 0448 ________________________________ From: nvrg-bounces at listserv.gwdg.de [mailto:nvrg-bounces at listserv.gwdg.de] On Behalf Of Dae Young KIM Sent: den 21 oktober 2009 16:48 To: Joe Touch Cc: nvrg at listserv.gwdg.de Subject: Re: [nvrg-bof] poll on charter focus - RESPONSES DUE OCT 23 Hi, I support pursue of both topics in the RG. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu<mailto:touch at isi.edu>> wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aaron Falk wrote: > To be very explicit, I'd like to ask whether the folks on this list > who might participate in a research group feel that such an RG > should focus on a) the virtualization of networks or b) > virtualization of systems including networks and others things such > as hosts, services, storage, sensors/actuators. Hi, all, Work on updating the charter proposal hasn't progressed since the last meeting in Stockholm. Aaron and I exchanged some ideas a month ago, and Aaron asked for people to voice their position above then. I haven't heard any discussion. In order for this group to move forward, we need to decide what our focus is. So, to that end, I'll summarize the current views: a) virtualization of networks Joe b) virtualization of systems, incl. networks, hosts, services, storage, sensors/actuators Aaron Can everyone on this list please try to post a short not indicating your view of where this group should focus ASAP, no later than Friday Oct 23. That should help us gauge how to proceed. Thanks, Joe (just as a list member) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkrSOWQACgkQE5f5cImnZrseOwCfS2TZMlR3goricP61J9O8TLl0 btgAoOn6+MJdOkdPRUKLrpHF9OD3tMlw =LOZb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Regards, DY http://cnu.kr/~dykim
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.