Hi, On 11.02.2011 16:59, Roland Bless wrote: > the difference between logical and virtual isn't > that easy and sometimes seems artificial. After spending some more thoughts on this: it seems to be the case that both mechanisms are often combined and that they can be applied on top of each other in various ways: consider some kind of Ethernet link aggregation mechanism that probably provides mainly a logical resource, but on top of this logical link one could provide a virtual link, whose interface looks exactly like an ordinary Ethernet link (except for higher capacity, higher resilience etc.) between a single pair of MAC addresses. So that explains, why the distinction between logical and virtual is often unclear or blurred. > * a virtual resource appears to a user of that resource > as if he is the (exclusive) owner of that resource. > A user's access is always carried out on the real resource. > * a logical resource is created by transforming one > or several features of a real resource and by > offering it in this way to the user. > > This requires use of a mapping layer that transforms > the interface of the real resource(s) into a more > purposeful interface. Thus, the logical resource/device > may be simpler to handle from a user's point of view > and constitutes an improved but different resource > or device. Such transformations may be performed in order to: change the size of transport units, change the capacity, change the access delay, change the access mode, combine several devices, distribute to several devices, etc. Regards, Roland
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.